LEY 22285 PDF

The appellant alleged that Article 45 of the Broadcasting Law (Ley de .. Por lo que el párrafo primero del Art. 45 de la ley y las normas dictadas en su. , Spanish, Book edition: Radiodifusión: marco regulatorio: Ley nacional de radiodifusión 22,, Decreto reglamentario /81 / [Claudio] Schifer. (Law of , InfoLEG, available at (Gustavo Ybarra, El kirchnerismo logró aprobar en general la nueva ley de medios, DIARIO LA.

Author: Zulkizragore Duran
Country: Zimbabwe
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Sex
Published (Last): 3 December 2009
Pages: 385
PDF File Size: 17.22 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.19 Mb
ISBN: 615-6-62533-366-7
Downloads: 73537
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mujas

Criminal defamation and public officials. States have the obligation to guarantee the full exercise of this right. Radio stations also carry La Hora Nacionalan hour-long radio program aired on Sunday nights, as part of this requirement. Since Chile’s return to democracy inmost cadenas nacionales have been voluntary in nature, but in the government of Augusto Pinochet and his predecessors, stations were obliged to carry these messages.

Initially conceived as a form of emergency population warningthese broadcasts are often of a political nature, as most of them are messages by governmental authorities about various topics of general interest.


The Organic Communication Law’s article 74 replaced it, retaining the requirements for broadcasters and extending them to pay television services, which must suspend their own program transmissions to carry cadenas. Attacks on journalists are specifically intended to silence them, and so they also constitute violations of the right of a society to have free access to information.

Views Read Edit View history. In several Latin American countries, a cadena nacional “national network”, also referred to as a cadena oficial or red voluntaria is a joint broadcast, over various media ely radio and televisiondirected at the general population of a state.

Cadenas nacionales are obligatory for all television and radio stations, and are used to broadcast presidential reports and messages of national interest. Sixth and last, and summarizing the foregoing conclusions, if an informer has legitimately exercised his right to freedom of expression, the conclusion lwy a violation to the right to the protection of honor has been committed cannot be validly reached.

All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

Consequently, this Court understands that it must be rejected …. Administrative accord regulates cadenas nacionales in Nicaragua.

Forma funcion, Santaf, de Bogot, D. Court of Appeals of Santiago de Chile. Retrieved from ” https: This principle allows only exceptional limitations that must be previously be established by law in case of a real and imminent danger that threatens national security in democratic societies. Therefore, it must be concluded, according to the provision of Article 10 of the Republic’s Constitution, that his conduct is exempt from this Magistrate’s authority.


In some countries, including Argentina and Venezuela, all stations are mandated to air these messages lwy in nature to Emergency Action Notifications in the United States.

In this case, the information would cease to be of a private nature—as is characteristic of a merely contractual relationship—and would become of public interest.

Sergio Israel Dubinsky, has legitimately exercised his right to inform. On one occasion, television stations were forced to broadcast a minute-long musical performance contained within a cadena nacional.

In each of the categories, the relevant principle is quoted from the Declaration, followed by a short summary of the facts of the case, and extracts from the decision of the domestic court.

Articles with Spanish-language external links Interlanguage link template link number Articles containing video clips. The Court does not find that there is a higher aim which would authorize preventing the complainant from participating in a bidding process aimed at regularizing his legal situation and being able, if chosen, to exercise his right to freedom of expression.

Forced cadenas nacionales of a political nature have been strongly criticized by some media outlets, as in some cases it requires them to broadcast opinions that differ from 222855 normal editorial stances.

Domestic Jurisprudence of the Member States. Facts of the case.

Texto completo de la Ley Nº , de Radiodifusión | El Cronista

The selection has been somewhat arbitrary, both for reasons of space and for lack of sufficient information. Case of April 16, It looks like JavaScript is either disabled or turned off.

According to these provisions, only the applicants for a legal concession to provide a station of sound broadcasting with frequency modulation who are a “physical person or commercial corporation which is legally constituted” are eligible for such concession, excluding therefore civil corporations, cooperatives, and mutual associations.

Everyone has the right lwy freedom of thought and expression. When such a message is delivered, all Argentine television stations must cease all programming to allow for the broadcasting of the message. Regarding the request for information posed by the complainant, and in order to avoid confusion, it is 222855 to point out that it presents two aspects that demand a differentiated solution, namely: Dublinsky, of a series of articles portraying the claimant’s involvement in acts of corruption such as requesting the payment of a bribe, and awarding state benefits to his personal acquaintances.

Por favor ative o JavaScript para visualizar este site. The right of expression may not be restricted by indirect methods or means, such as the abuse of government or private controls over newsprint, radio broadcasting frequencies, or equipment used in the dissemination of information, or by any other means tending to impede the communication and circulation of ideas and opinions.

Democratic criteria for the concession of radio and television broadcast frequencies. The author, and, in some cases, the printer or transmitter of the statement will be responsible for the abuses lfy commit.


According to the legal framework that governs broadcasting, in order 2225 apply for 22825 legal authorization to provide a broadcasting station with frequency modulation, it is required that the applicant is a physical person or a commercial corporation that is legally constituted, which excludes civil associations, cooperatives, and mutual and non-profit associations.

The Rapporteur hopes that this attitude will prevail among other judges in the hemisphere. In its Annual Report, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights noted that “the Inter-American Court of Human Rights “the Court” has stated that because freedom of expression and thought plays a crucial and central role in public debate, the American Convention places an “extremely high value” on this right and reduces to a minimum any restrictions on it.

The information requested by the Representative included the following: The Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression has pursued the aim of furthering comparative law studies as a way of contributing to the flow of information between the member States regarding the international standards which govern the right to freedom of expression, in the hope that it will lead to a deeper understanding and establishment of the right to freedom of expression in the Americas.

In this section, the report refers to the States’ domestic jurisprudence, and it includes certain decisions by local tribunals that were handed down during and that reflect the importance of respecting freedom of expression as protected in the American Convention.

La “Legitimidad” Del Enunciador Juridico en la Ley de Radiodifusion Argentina (22285/80) (Report)

Therefore, if the appeal were admitted and the subsequent exhibitions of the piece which has given rise to it prohibited, this Court would incur in a form of prior censorship, which is forbidden to this Court. Thirdly, that the protection offered by this right must not only be regarded as pertaining to favorable ideas, but also, most importantly, to those that might be offensive, disturbing, exaggerated, prone to incite strong reactions, or shocking, because such are the demands of pluralism and mental openness without which a democratic society cannot exist.

Spanish pdf Article in xml format 2285 references How to cite this article Automatic translation Send this article by e-mail. The organization of this section takes account, as it must, of the standards arising from interpretation of Article 13 of the Convention, which declares that:.